I thought crystallizers caused various problems. I have heard of using MB-8 instead of a crystallizer.
Giorgia
We are currently polishing a floor ST Marktm. There have been tile replacement and you can dramatically see what was restored in the past compared to the manufacturers finish. Originally the floor on a lower level was grinded and polished. Later a few tiles were changed. The difference is staggering. The manufactured product looks like a flat piece of glass, the grinded material looks like its warped, opened veins, pores etc. This looks to me like the perfect bad effect of having a resigned stone. Looks great initially but the moment you try to maintain it , you get in trouble.
One floor on two levels, top and bottom
Bottom
lippage free, except for certain areas which were changed
Finish High Shine
Sealed Using Enhancer pro DuPont
Certain areas polished floor using Nilfisk Crystallizer, more clarity achieved but floor now looks greasy
Top
Has Lippage (never grinded)
Sealed using Enhancer pro from DuPont
Polished maintained using polishing powders
Also tried polishing floor using Nilfisk Crystallizer, more clarity achieved but floor now looks greasy
I have tried polishing it, but the color faded,
We the proceeded to enhance it, looked better
The crystallizer really brought out the clarity
But now it looks like a film is on the surface
What can you share about your St Mark experiences
Anthony Masecchia
Master Stone Consultant
Marble Maestro
T. 514.777.7797
F. 514.904.1815
E. anthony@777-7797.com
Active President of BNI Westmount
Powered by http://DiscussThis.com
Visit list archives, subscribe, unsubscribe or change your subscription preferences
Start a new conversation (thread)